The Nevada Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in a case involving the use of GPS tracking devices by the Mayor of Reno, Hillary Schieve. The case stems from a lawsuit filed by the Reno Police Protective Association, which alleges that Mayor Schieve violated the law by secretly tracking the movements of police officers using GPS devices.
The lawsuit claims that Mayor Schieve exceeded her authority by monitoring the activities of police officers without their consent or knowledge. The Mayor has denied any wrongdoing, stating that the GPS devices were only used for legitimate public safety purposes.
The case has drawn attention due to the privacy concerns raised by the use of GPS tracking technology on public employees. The Nevada Supreme Court will now have to weigh in on the legality of Mayor Schieve’s actions and determine whether she violated any laws by using the GPS devices.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the use of GPS technology by government officials and could set a precedent for future cases involving privacy rights and the use of surveillance technology. The arguments are set to be heard in the coming weeks, and a decision is expected to be reached shortly thereafter.
Source
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image of the presented article.
