Nevada and California Prison Reform Votes Highlight Divergent Attitudes
In a significant divergence on prison reform, California voters chose to maintain the status quo on “involuntary servitude” in prisons through the defeat of Proposition 6, while Nevada voters overwhelming passed a measure to ban “slavery and involuntary servitude.” These contrasting outcomes have sparked discussions about the political leanings of voters in these neighboring states—especially given Nevada’s greater support for Donald Trump in the 2020 elections compared to California, a traditionally blue state.
Key differences between the two measures clarify the divergent results. Nevada’s question explicitly used the term "slavery," which likely resonated with voters, raising alarm over its legality as a punishment for crime. In contrast, California’s Proposition 6 lacked direct reference to slavery, making it less compelling for voters. Additionally, California’s proposition would have ended mandatory labor for prisoners, while Nevada’s measure is largely symbolic, leaving its practical implications uncertain.
Advocates argue that eliminating involuntary servitude in California could lead to a focus on rehabilitation for inmates. Yet, some voters contend that involuntary labor is a form of punishment appropriate for those who have committed crimes. California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s ballot description focused on legal nuances, potentially leading to confusion among voters.
Nevada Assemblymember Howard Watts, inspired by Ava DuVernay’s documentary “13th,” emphasized simplicity in their measure, contrasting with California’s more complex approach. Despite losing, proponents of Proposition 6 remain hopeful for future reform, emphasizing grassroots engagement by formerly incarcerated individuals as a crucial victory in itself and signaling an ongoing fight for change in California’s penal system.
Source
Photo credit www.latimes.com
