In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has decided not to restore Green Party candidate Jill Stein to the Nevada ballot for the upcoming election. The decision was made after the Nevada Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s ruling that Stein did not meet the requirements to be on the ballot as an independent candidate.
Stein had attempted to appeal the decision to the US Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court’s ruling violated her constitutional rights. However, the Supreme Court declined to take up the case, effectively ending Stein’s legal battle to be included on the ballot in Nevada.
This decision comes after a series of legal battles in multiple states where Stein has sought to be included on the ballot as a third-party candidate. Stein’s campaign has faced challenges in several states, with courts ruling against her in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania as well.
Stein’s exclusion from the Nevada ballot could have implications for the upcoming election, as third-party candidates often play a role in shaping the political landscape. Without Stein on the ballot, voters in Nevada will have fewer choices when it comes to selecting a candidate for president.
Despite this setback, Stein remains committed to her campaign and her platform, which includes calling for a Green New Deal and advocating for social justice and environmental sustainability. While she may not be on the ballot in Nevada, Stein’s supporters are likely to continue to advocate for her platform and message leading up to the election.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s decision not to restore Jill Stein to the Nevada ballot is a blow to her campaign, but she remains committed to her message and her platform as the election approaches.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com