In a recent article published in the Nevada Appeal, writer Jim Hartman argues that Senator Kamala Harris emerged as the victor in the recent vice presidential debate against Vice President Mike Pence. Despite this win, Hartman questions the significance of the debate in the grand scheme of the election.
Hartman notes Harris’ strong performance during the debate, praising her ability to stick to key points and effectively counter Pence’s arguments. He also highlights Harris’ composed demeanor and ability to connect with viewers, noting that she effectively presented herself as a viable candidate for vice president.
However, Hartman raises the question of whether the vice presidential debate truly holds any weight in determining the outcome of the election. He points out that vice presidential debates have historically had limited impact on voter opinions, with the focus remaining on the presidential candidates themselves.
Hartman suggests that while Harris may have won the debate, ultimately it is the performance of presidential candidates Joe Biden and Donald Trump that will matter most to voters. He emphasizes the importance of the upcoming presidential debates in shaping public opinion and influencing the outcome of the election.
Overall, Hartman’s article offers a critical analysis of the vice presidential debate, acknowledging Harris’ strong performance while also questioning its impact on the overall election. As the nation prepares for the upcoming presidential debates, the focus remains on the candidates themselves and the issues that matter most to American voters.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com
